tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32512109.post4245959457025850670..comments2024-03-27T11:10:52.382-07:00Comments on On My Mind: Lying Liberal MediaJayhawkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00756807802218022043noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32512109.post-71147024994635430412011-03-31T10:27:44.388-07:002011-03-31T10:27:44.388-07:00well, it should not have passed with that kind of ...well, it should not have passed with that kind of a time frame and lack of understanding, no matter what it was. And even if it was 'no military action' and 'non-binding' that kinda makes Jayhawk's point that O'Donnell is a lying jackass.brucenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32512109.post-54175872273638836272011-03-31T08:24:38.827-07:002011-03-31T08:24:38.827-07:00And what does that have to do with anything?And what does that have to do with anything?Jayhawkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00756807802218022043noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-32512109.post-44407343949821470192011-03-31T08:21:29.465-07:002011-03-31T08:21:29.465-07:00Re: Rand Paul and the no fly zone resolution. The...Re: Rand Paul and the no fly zone resolution. There was no mention of any military action in the resolution title. Only the title was read on the floor (look at the congressional record). The resolution was 'deemed passed by motion without objection'. Rand Paul and others weren't given time to get back to the floor to object, in any event -- the whole thing took 40 seconds (it is on CSPAN) and Senators were never given a copy of the resolution to see what was in it. This was explained away by the fact that it was 'non binding'.<br /><br />http://t.co/Yp3YAvFAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com